Benchmarking Your 401(k) Accumulation

By Roger Chen, CFA | MYeCFO Financial Advisors | Fractional CFO Services Leader



The finance and investment sector can be daunting when it comes to planning for one's financial future. Every day, CNBC features experts who analyze the latest economic indicators, such as inflation rates and GDP growth, and predict market trends. For those without a background in investing, this barrage of technical terms can be confusing. All the while, many have become de facto portfolio managers through their 401(k)s. This raises some important questions:

  • How effectively am I managing my 401(k)?
  • What types of investments should be in my portfolio given my age?
  • Will my retirement savings be sufficient when I need them?
  • What financial changes can I expect over the next 10, 20, or 30 years?

While there are various ways to address this, I'd like to share one method that I've found useful both personally and professionally.

Always pay yourself first

Possibly without exception, one of the best personal finance strategies is to “pay yourself first”, which means automatically routing a specified contribution from each paycheck into a savings or investment account. Traditional 401(k) participants receive the added tax benefits of pre-tax contributions and tax-deferred growth inside their 401(k) accounts. Traditional IRA and SEP IRA accounts also allow for pre-tax contributions and tax-deferred growth albeit with different annual contribution limits.


How am I doing?

As an objective benchmarking exercise, you can compare your year-end 401(k) balance to that of a participant who contributed the IRS-specified annual limit each year for those under age 50 and simply invested in an S&P 500 Total Return Index fund. The table below shows the 401(k) historical accumulation balances by starting year and years of contributions for the last 21 years.


401(k) Accumulation by Starting Year Assuming Maximum Annual Contributions and Annual S&P 500 Total Returns

Starting Year Years of Contributions Year-End 2024 401(k) Balance
2004 21 $1,541,697
2005 20 $1,438,285
2006 19 $1,337,846
2007 18 $1,235,269
2008 17 $1,143,727
2009 16 $1,056,950
2010 15 $910,321
2011 14 $794,372
2012 13 $693,599
2013 12 $591,919
2014 11 $501,685
2015 10 $433,527
2016 9 $371,864
2017 8 $311,040
2018 7 $256,714
2019 6 $210,883
2020 5 $161,657
2021 4 $123,236
2022 3 $90,785
2023 2 $64,279
2024 1 $28,755

The fact that the accumulated balances increase monotonically with each additional year of contributions is a testament to the power of investing consistently and staying invested during one’s asset accumulation phase. This is despite S&P 500 Total Return losses of -37.0% in 2008 and -18.1% in 2022.

Why would my balance be different?

Let’s examine factors that would explain the difference between your actual 401(k) balance and the benchmark balance in the table.


Factors that would increase your accumulated 401(k) balance:

  • Investment returns that consistently outperformed the annual S&P 500 Total Returns
  • Employer-matching contributions
  • Dollar-cost averaging (for simplicity my calculations assumed annual contributions and returns; bi-weekly or semi-monthly contributions should produce a marginal dollar-cost averaging benefit due to volatile market prices)

Factors that would decrease your accumulated 401(k) balance:

  • A more conservative asset allocation than the S&P 500 (which is 100% large cap US stocks)
  • Fees and expenses associated with your 401(k) plan and within your fund options
  • Having contributed less than the annual limits each year
  • Any gap periods in your 401(k) participation or eligibility
  • Early withdrawals

Summary

Ultimately, there is no universal benchmark for what your accumulated 401(k) balance should be. That is determined by your risk tolerance and is constrained by the investment options available in your 401(k) plan. The example above illustrates the concept of the Most Efficient Investable Product (MEIP) assuming the S&P 500 is an appropriate benchmark for our hypothetical, maximum contribution 401(k) participant. Ideally, your appropriate benchmark can be constructed as a composite of MEIPs by asset class that corresponds to your optimal asset allocation, which should be a function of your investment objectives and risk tolerance.